Arsenal’s interest in signing Vinicius Junior from Real Madrid is a measure of their stratospheric rise in status and power under manager Mikel Arteta.There are still considerable obstacles before any deal can become a reality, but a transfer of this magnitude was inconceivable when Arteta first took the reins in December 2019. And it would arguably be not only the biggest signing in Arsenal’s history, but in the 34-year Premier League era.In raw financial terms, it is unlikely Vinicius Jr’s potential transfer fee would eclipse the £125million ($168m at current exchange rates) Premier League record Liverpool set when they signed Alexander Isak from Newcastle United last September, given the Brazil forward’s Madrid contract is due to expire next summer.But it is the identity of the selling club that makes this such an unprecedented proposition.Madrid almost never part with a peak-age, high-performing superstar. They are among a select group of clubs to have poured more money into the Premier League than they have received from it.According to respected German website Transfermarkt, Madrid have spent a net £153million on Premier League players since 1992, behind only their Clasico rivals Barcelona (£163m) and ahead of Bundesliga giants Bayern Munich (£87m).Drilling down into their Premier League dealings, the three biggest transactions involving moves to the Bernabeu are the signings of Eden Hazard from Chelsea in 2019 (which Transfermarkt puts at £103million), Gareth Bale from Tottenham Hotspur in 2013 (£87m) and Cristiano Ronaldo from Manchester United in 2009 (£81m).In each case, the selling club were reluctant to part with their talisman, but ultimately bowed to the player’s determination to join Madrid.The three largest outgoings from Madrid to English sides, while all highly rated players, were never considered quite as indispensable.Casemiro was thought to be past his peak at 30 when he signed for Manchester United in 2022, while Alvaro Morata, who joined Chelsea in 2017, never truly convinced as a long-term centre-forward option at the Bernabeu.Arsenal are one of the few clubs with experience of prising a genuine star from Madrid, signing Mesut Ozil for a then club-record £42million in 2013. The German had recorded a staggering 26 assists the previous season, and his arrival was a sizeable coup for manager Arsene Wenger. But, for all his creative brilliance, Ozil was deemed the necessary sacrifice to help fund Bale’s arrival, who joined Madrid the day after he was sold.It was a similar story with Angel Di Maria, who left for Manchester United in summer 2014, just three months after being named man of the match in Madrid’s 4-1 Champions League final victory against city neighbours Atletico. Such was the club’s star power, he was viewed as secondary to their vaunted front three of Karim Benzema, Bale and Ronaldo, and was moved on to offset the cost of signing James Rodriguez and Toni Kroos in that same window.If the Vinicius Jr deal does materialise, it would be somewhat comparable to Robinho’s transfer from Madrid to Manchester City in 2008, when he was signed at 24 years old for £32.5million, a Premier League record at the time.The Brazilian had finished ninth in the 2007 Ballon d’Or voting and was already an established star, but even then, his individual record pales in comparison to Vinicius Jr’s. The latter has been in the Ballon d’Or’s top 20 in each of the past four years, placing second in 2024, while he has also hit double digits for goals in five straight La Liga campaigns.It is a similar story with Madrid’s biggest rivals Barcelona, where the highest fees have been spent on players arriving from the Premier League rather than moving in the opposite direction. Their moves for Philippe Coutinho (£116million in January 2018, according to Transfermarkt) and Luis Suarez (£70m in 2014), both from Liverpool, are the two most expensive examples of that trend.But the status of a transfer is not defined by its fee alone, particularly with fee inflation making comparisons across eras difficult. Even accounting for that, the balance of power remains firmly in Barcelona’s favour, including the high-profile signings of Thierry Henry and Cesc Fabregas from Arsenal, two players the London club were desperate to keep.Outside the Madrid-Barca sphere, there are several other contenders for the Premier League’s biggest-ever transfer.Andriy Shevchenko probably has the strongest claim, after joining Chelsea from Milan in 2006. The Ukrainian had won the Ballon d’Or two years earlier, while his £30.8million move broke the British transfer record. There is an argument he arrived past his peak at four months shy of 30, but that was a judgement largely made after the fact, following his disappointing spell at Stamford Bridge. He was Milan’s top scorer with 19 Serie A goals the season before he came to England.Paul Pogba also has a strong claim, arriving at Manchester United as a ready-made star from reigning Serie A champions Juventus for a world-record £89.3million in 2016. The sheen is slightly taken off the move, however, by Pogba having already played for United before leaving for Juventus on a free transfer at 18. And, while Juventus were the dominant force in Italian football at the time, they never quite had the same pull as Madrid and Barcelona, or the great Milan side Shevchenko had been part of in the early 2000s.Erling Haaland was the most coveted player on the market when Manchester City signed him from Borussia Dortmund, triggering his £51million release clause at 21. But Premier League sides have rarely had much difficulty prising players from that club and, despite his frightening Bundesliga scoring record, Haaland was still a developing young talent.The Premier League’s financial power has grown considerably over the past decade, with its clubs accounting for almost half of the spending across Europe’s top five leagues in this current window.But while it is eating more and more of the overall cake, Madrid and Barcelona have still had their pick of the transfer-market cherries on top.If Arsenal get a deal for Vinicius Jr over the line, it could signal a seismic shift in the status quo.
Click here to read article